Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1807

reference
251-tree-1
name
1807
tree-preservation-order

undefined

251-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.001031 50.855923)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.000931 50.855912,-1.000936 50.855931,-1.000950 50.855949,-1.000971 50.855963,-1.000999 50.855972,-1.001030 50.855976,-1.001060 50.855973,-1.001088 50.855964,-1.001111 50.855951,-1.001125 50.855933,-1.001130 50.855914,-1.001126 50.855894,-1.001112 50.855877,-1.001090 50.855862,-1.001063 50.855853,-1.001032 50.855850,-1.001001 50.855853,-1.000974 50.855861,-1.000951 50.855875,-1.000937 50.855893,-1.000931 50.855912)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL